The Impact of Self-Efficacy on Telemedicine Adoption in Emerging Country

Danupol Hoonsopon, Chaninun Ketkaew, Wilert Puriwat, Wattana Viriyasitavat, Suchart Tripopsakul

Abstract


Telemedicine has emerged as a vital innovation in healthcare, improving access to medical services by reducing the need for physical interactions. Previous studies revealed that self-efficacy influences individuals’ perceptions and behaviors toward adopting new technologies, especially telemedicine. However, these studies do not emphasize understanding how three sources of self-efficacy, namely, enactive mastery (EM), vicarious experience (VE), and verbal persuasion (VP), affect telemedicine adoption (TA) through perceptions of telemedicine technology. Based on the sample of 240 respondents, structural equation modeling (SEM) analysis was utilized to examine the proposed hypotheses. The results revealed that enactive mastery and vicarious experience positively influence perceived ease of use (PE), with vicarious experience also significantly impacting perceived usefulness (PU). Perceived ease of use significantly impacted perceived usefulness, strongly influencing telemedicine adoption. These findings confirm the impact of self-efficacy, especially enactive mastery, and vicarious experience components in sharping perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness. These are essential for driving telemedicine adoption and facilitating its adoption in an emerging country. The findings highlight the importance of these self-efficacy sources in telemedicine adoption strategies and suggest that enhancing individuals’ direct experiences and observational learning can foster telemedicine usage in emerging markets.

 

Doi: 10.28991/HIJ-2025-06-01-09

Full Text: PDF


Keywords


Telemedicine Adoption; Self-efficacy; Technology Acceptance Model; Emerging Countries.

References


Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191.

Maddux, J. E. (1995). Self-efficacy theory: An introduction. In Self-efficacy, adaptation, and adjustment: Theory, research, and application. Springer, Boston, United States. doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-6868-5_1.

Chinn, D., & McCarthy, C. (2013). All Aspects of Health Literacy Scale (AAHLS): Developing a tool to measure functional, communicative and critical health literacy in primary healthcare settings. Patient Education and Counseling, 90(2), 247–253. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2012.10.019.

Del Giudice, M., Soto-Acosta, P., Carayannis, E., & Scuotto, V. (2018). Emerging perspectives on business process management (BPM): IT-based processes and ambidextrous organizations, theory and practice. Business Process Management Journal, 24(5), 1070–1076. doi:10.1108/BPMJ-09-2018-336.

Dam, L., Roy, D., Atkin, D. J., & Rogers, D. (2018). Applying an Integrative Technology Adoption Paradigm to Health App Adoption and Use. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 62(4), 654–672. doi:10.1080/08838151.2018.1519568.

Scott Kruse, C., Karem, P., Shifflett, K., Vegi, L., Ravi, K., & Brooks, M. (2018). Evaluating barriers to adopting telemedicine worldwide: A systematic review. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 24(1), 4–12. doi:10.1177/1357633X16674087.

Zhang, X., Han, X., Dang, Y., Meng, F., Guo, X., & Lin, J. (2017). User acceptance of mobile health services from users’ perspectives: The role of self-efficacy and response-efficacy in technology acceptance. Informatics for Health and Social Care, 42(2), 194–206. doi:10.1080/17538157.2016.1200053.

Margolis, H., & Mccabe, P. P. (2006). Improving self-efficacy and motivation: What to do, what to say. Intervention in School and Clinic, 41(4), 218–227. doi:10.1177/10534512060410040401.

WHO. (2010). Telemedicine: Opportunities and developments in member states. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland. Available online: https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/44497 (accessed on February 2025).

BIS Research. (2023). Telehealth and telemedicine: Making treatment possible anytime, anywhere. BIS Research Inc. Noida, India. Available online: https://bisresearch.com/insights/telehealth-and-telemedicine-making-treatment-possible-anytime-anywhere (accessed on February 2025).

Sriyananda, V. (2024). Accessing telemedicine in Thailand: Benefits and effective tips for expats. Pacific Prime Thailand, Bangkok, Thailand. Available online: https://www.pacificprime.co.th/blog/accessing-telemedicine-in-thailand-benefits-and-effective-tips-for-expats/ (accessed on February 2025).

Abraham, C., & Sheeran, P. (2014). The health belief model. Cambridge Handbook of Psychology, Health and Medicine. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511543579.022.

Hofstede, G. (1984). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values (Volume 5). Sage, New York, United States.

Yuen, Y. Y., Yeow, P. H. P., Lim, N., & Saylani, N. (2010). Internet banking adoption: Comparing developed and developing countries. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 51(1), 52–61.

Hoonsopon, D. (2016). Accelerating Adoption of New Products of Thai Consumers: The Moderating Roles of Self-Brand Concept and Reference Group. Journal of Asia-Pacific Business, 17(2), 151–172. doi:10.1080/10599231.2016.1166023.

Lunenburg, F. C. (2011). Self-efficacy in the workplace: Implications for motivation and performance. International journal of management, business, and administration, 14(1), 1-6.

Rho, M. J., Choi, I. young, & Lee, J. (2014). Predictive factors of telemedicine service acceptance and behavioral intention of physicians. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 83(8), 559–571. doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2014.05.005.

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 13(3), 319–339. doi:10.2307/249008.

Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models. Management Science, 35(8), 982–1003. doi:10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982.

Puriwat, W., & Tripopsakul, S. (2021). Explaining an adoption and continuance intention to use contactless payment technologies: During the covid-19 pandemic. Emerging Science Journal, 5(1), 85–95. doi:10.28991/esj-2021-01260.

Hofstede, G. (2011). Dimensionalizing Cultures: The Hofstede Model in Context. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1), 8. doi:10.9707/2307-0919.1014.

Lee, S. G., Trimi, S., & Kim, C. (2013). The impact of cultural differences on technology adoption. Journal of World Business, 48(1), 20–29. doi:10.1016/j.jwb.2012.06.003.

Donchalermpak, P. (2020). Telemedicine for Thailand. BOI e-Journal, 3(6), 12–17. Available online: https://www.boi.go.th/upload/content/DR.raksa.pdf (accessed on February 2025).

Munnukka, J., & Järvi, P. (2011). The value drivers of high-tech consumer products. Journal of Marketing Management, 27(5–6), 582–601. doi:10.1080/02672571003737783.

Eisend, M., & Kuss, A. (2019). Research Methodology in Marketing: Theory Development, Empirical Approaches and Philosophy of Science Considerations. Research Methodology in Marketing: Theory Development, Empirical Approaches and Philosophy of Science Considerations. Springer, Cham, Switzerland. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-10794-9.

Gaganpreet, S. (2017). Pros and cons of different sampling techniques. International Journal of Applied Research, 3(7), 749–752.

Yang, K., & Banamah, A. (2014). Quota sampling as an alternative to probability sampling? An experimental study. Sociological Research Online, 19(1), 56–66. doi:10.5153/sro.3199.

Statista. (2024). Resident population in Thailand as of March 2024, by age group. Statista. Available online: https://www.statista.com/statistics/1283627/thailand-resident-population-by-age-group/ (accessed on February 2025).

Statista. (2023). Population Share of the ASEAN Countries in 2022. Statista. Available online: https://www.statista.com/statistics/1095818/asean-population-by-gender/ (accessed on February 2025).

Wangwongwiroj, T., & Yasri, P. (2021). The Comparison of Students’ Perceived Levels of Self-Efficacy in Live, Online and Live Online Courses. International Journal on Research in STEM Education, 3(1), 47–54. doi:10.31098/ijrse.v3i1.505.

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis: Pearson College Division. Person, London, United Kingdom.

Cheung, G. W., Cooper-Thomas, H. D., Lau, R. S., & Wang, L. C. (2024). Reporting reliability, convergent and discriminant validity with structural equation modeling: A review and best-practice recommendations. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 41(2), 745–783. doi:10.1007/s10490-023-09871-y.

Awang, Z. (2015). SEM Made Simple: A Gentle Approach to Learning Structural Equation Modelling. In MPWS Rich Publication (Vol. 1, Issue 3). MPWS Rich Publication.

Booth, N., McConnell, T., Tully, M., Hamill, R., & Best, P. (2024). Exploring behaviour-intention gaps to explain low retention in a community-based video-conferencing intervention for depression: lessons for researchers using technology as interventions. Mental Health and Digital Technologies, 1(1), 5–23. doi:10.1108/mhdt-11-2023-0002.

Thangavel, P., & Chandra, B. (2024). Digital Immigrants versus Digital Natives: Decoding Their E-commerce Adoption Behavior. SAGE Open, 14(4), 21582440241282436. doi:10.1177/21582440241282437.

Muellmann, S., Wiersing, R., & Brand, T. (2024). Digital health literacy of adults with low reading and writing skills: A mixed-methods study. European Journal of Public Health, 34(Supplement_3), ckae144-374. doi:10.1093/eurpub/ckae144.

Amin, S., Mustofa, M., Rahman, A., & Barman, H. An exploratory cross-sectional study of awareness and barriers to adoption of telemedicine services among patients in Bangladesh. Future Health, 2(2), 107–113. doi:10.1016/j.fhth.2024.03.007.

Arora, S., Huda, R. K., Verma, S., Khetan, M., & Sangwan, R. K. (2024). Challenges, Barriers, and Facilitators in Telemedicine Implementation in India: A Scoping Review. Cureus, 16(8), 67388. doi:10.7759/cureus.67388.


Full Text: PDF

DOI: 10.28991/HIJ-2025-06-01-09

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2025 Danupol Hoonsopon, Chaninun Ketkaew, Wilert Puriwat, Wattana Viriyasitavat, Suchart Tripopsakul