Comparative Analysis of Implementation of Solar PV Systems Using the Advanced SPECA Modelling Tool and HOMER Software: Kenyan Scenario

Samuel Kariuki Kibaara, D. K. Murage, P. Musau, M. J. Saulo


Globally, attention has been focused on the pollution and exhaustion of fossil fuels allied to conventional energy sources, while non-conventional energy/renewable energy sources have always been considered clean and environmentally friendly. Of the two, the non-conventional (renewable) is being preferred because it is believed to be more environmentally friendly. Renewable Energy Technologies (RETs), especially Solar Photovoltaics, have seen many plants being constructed to either supplement the grid or as alternatives for those far from the grid. Solar Photovoltaics plants occupy large tracts of land that would have been used for other economic activities for revenue generation, such as agriculture, forestry, or tourism at archaeological sites. The negative impacts slow down the application of Solar PV, but a modelling tool that can easily and quantitively assess the impacts in monetary form would accelerate the Solar PV application. The work presents a developed modelling tool that is able to assess not only the techno-economic impacts but also the environmental impacts in monetary form, allowing one to be able to determine the viability of a plant in a given region. The results are compared with those of the HOMER software.


Doi: 10.28991/HIJ-2020-01-01-02

Full Text: PDF


SPECA Tool; HOMER; Environment; Solar PV.


Painuly, J. P. (2001). Barriers to renewable energy penetration; a framework for analysis. Renewable Energy, 24(1), 73–89. doi:10.1016/s0960-1481(00)00186-5.

Burtraw, D., Krupnick, A., Sampson, G., & Beasley, B. (2012). The True Cost of Electric Power. RFF Report, Resources for the Future, Washington, DC, United States.

Connolly, D., Lund, H., Mathiesen, B. V., & Leahy, M. (2010). A review of computer tools for analysing the integration of renewable energy into various energy systems. Applied Energy, 87(4), 1059–1082. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2009.09.026.

Acakpovi, A., Hagan, E. B., & Michael, M. B. (2015). Cost benefit analysis of self-optimized hybrid solar-wind-hydro electrical energy supply as compared to HOMER optimization. International Journal of Computer Applications, 114(18), 32-38.

Rawat, R., & Chandel, S. S. (2013). Simulation and optimization of solar photovoltaic-wind stand-alone hybrid system in hilly terrain of India. International Journal of Renewable Energy Research (IJRER), 3(3), 595-604.

Amer, M., Namaane, A., & M’Sirdi, N. K. (2013). Optimization of Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems (HRES) Using PSO for Cost Reduction. Energy Procedia, 42, 318–327. doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2013.11.032.

Bansal, A. K., Gupta, R. A., & Kumar, R. (2011). Optimization of hybrid PV/wind energy system using Meta Particle Swarm Optimization (MPSO). India International Conference on Power Electronics 2010 (IICPE2010), New Delhi, India. doi:10.1109/iicpe.2011.5728079.

Ram, G. N., Shree, J. D., and Kiruthiga, A. (2013). Cost Optimization of Standalone Hybrid Power Generation System, International Journal of Advanced Research in Electrical, Electronics and Instrumentation Engineering, 2(8), 4048–4057.

Lotfi, S., Tarazouei, F. L., & Ghiamy, M. (2013). Optimal design of a hybrid solar-wind-diesel power system for rural electrification using imperialist competitive algorithm. International Journal of Renewable Energy Research (IJRER), 3(2), 403-411.

Sharma, D., Gaur, P., & Mittal, A. P. (2014). Comparative Analysis of Hybrid GAPSO Optimization Technique with GA and PSO Methods for Cost Optimization of an Off-Grid Hybrid Energy System. Energy Technology & Policy, 1(1), 106–114. doi:10.1080/23317000.2014.969450.

Idoumghar, L., Melkemi, M., Schott, R., & Aouad, M. I. (2011). Hybrid PSO-SA Type Algorithms for Multimodal Function Optimization and Reducing Energy Consumption in Embedded Systems. Applied Computational Intelligence and Soft Computing, 2011, 1–12. doi:10.1155/2011/138078.

Ekren, B. Y., & Ekren, O. (2009). Simulation based size optimization of a PV/wind hybrid energy conversion system with battery storage under various load and auxiliary energy conditions. Applied Energy, 86(9), 1387–1394. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2008.12.015.

Barakat, S., Samy, M. M., Eteiba, M. B., & Wahba, W. I. (2016). Feasibility Study of Grid Connected PV-Biomass Integrated Energy System in Egypt. International Journal of Emerging Electric Power Systems, 17(5), 519–528. doi:10.1515/ijeeps-2016-0056.

Ashok, S. (2007). Optimised model for community-based hybrid energy system. Renewable Energy, 32(7), 1155–1164. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2006.04.008.

Mohamed, E. S. (2017). Economics of variable renewable sources for electric power production. Lap Lambert Academic Publishing, Sunnyvale, CA, USA.

Namovicz, C. (2013). Assessing the economic value of new utility-scale renewable generation projects. In EIA Energy Conference, 1-20. U.S. Energy Information Administration, Washington, DC, USA.

Khatib, T., Ibrahim, I. A., & Mohamed, A. (2016). A review on sizing methodologies of photovoltaic array and storage battery in a standalone photovoltaic system. Energy Conversion and Management, 120, 430–448. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2016.05.011.

Chaudhary, A., Verones, F., De Baan, L., & Hellweg, S. (2015). Quantifying land use impacts on biodiversity: combining species–area models and vulnerability indicators. Environmental Science & Technology, 49(16), 9987-9995. doi:10.1021/acs.est.5b02507.

Pereira, H. M., Ziv, G. U. Y., & Miranda, M. (2014). Countryside species–area relationship as a valid alternative to the matrix-calibrated species–area model. Conservation Biology, 28(3), 874. doi:10.1111/cobi.12289.

Wilson, M. A., Costanza, R., Boumans, R., & Liu, S. (2005). Integrated assessment and valuation of ecosystem goods and services provided by coastal systems. The intertidal ecosystem: the value of Ireland’s shores. Royal Irish Academy, 1-24.

Nkambule, N. P., & Blignaut, J. N. (2017). Externality costs of the coal-fuel cycle: The case of Kusile Power Station. South African Journal of Science, 113(9-10), 1-9. doi:10.17159/sajs.2017/20160314.

Friedrich, R.; Rabl, A., Hirschberg, S., Desaigues, B., Markandya, A., de Nocker, L. (2004). New elements for the assessment of external costs from energy technologies. In EU 5th Framework Programme; Institute for Energy Economics and the Rational Use of Energy: Stuttgart, Germany.

Preiss, P., & Klotz, V. (2008). NEEDS New Energy Externalities Developments for Sustainability. Technical Paper no. 7.4–RS 1b.“Description of updated and extended draft tools for the detailed site-dependent assessment of external costs”. Universität Stuttgart, Germany.

Masters, G. M. (2013). Renewable and Efficient Electric Power Systems. John Wiley & Sons, New York, United States.

Moss, J., Coram, A., & Blashki, G. (2014). Solar Energy in Australia: Health and environmental Costs and Benefits of Solar energy in Australia. The Australia Institute, Canberra, Australia.

Full Text: PDF

DOI: 10.28991/HIJ-2020-01-01-02


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2020 samuel kariuki kibaara