The Benefits of a Convergence between Art and Engineering

Giovanni Innella, Paul Anthony Rodgers


As design practitioners researchers and educators, we constantly find ourselves shuffled between humanities and sciences. In fact, the design departments in the universities around the globe are located within the faculties of engineering, architecture, visual art, liberal are or environmental sciences, thus becoming a meeting point for academics and professionals coming from both the humanities and sciences. The synergy resulting from the varieties of backgrounds and expertise creates a fertile ground for explorations on both a conceptual and a technical level. By briefly compiling and analysing a review of literature and creative works spanning from the renaissance to contemporary art, this paper reflects on the potential benefits of combining engineering and art research. The authors of this paper look at the increasingly delicate role that technicians, engineers and computer programmers play in developing technologies that impact our social, emotional and intimal lives, and advocate for art as a context and tool to help those professional developing their sensitivity and critical sense, besides their skills. In doing so, the paper makes a contribution to the STEM vs. STEAM conundrum, encouraging an education that merges arts and humanities disciplines with scientific and technical subjects.


Doi: 10.28991/HIJ-2021-02-01-04

Full Text: PDF


Art; Engineering; Indisciplinarity; STEAM; STEM; Humanities.


Jones, J. (2012, May 1). Is Leonardo da Vinci a great artist or a great scientist? Available online: (accessed on 31 August 2016).

Pitenis, A. A., Dowson, D., & Gregory Sawyer, W. (2014). Leonardo da Vinci’s Friction Experiments: An Old Story Acknowledged and Repeated. Tribology Letters, 56(3), 509–515. doi:10.1007/s11249-014-0428-7.

Wilson, E. O. (2014). The meaning of human existence (First edition). New York: Liveright Publishing Corporation, a Division of W.W. Norton & Company.

Bayer, H., Gropius, W., & Gropius, I. (1952). Bauhaus, 1919-1928. Charles T. Branford Company.

Whitford, F. (1984). Bauhaus. London: Thames and Hudson.

Zald, M. N. (1993). Organization Studies as a Scientific and Humanistic Enterprise: Toward a Reconceptualization of the Foundations of the Field. Organization Science, 4(4), 513–528. doi:10.1287/orsc.4.4.513.

Ortony, A. (2003). Emotion by accident, emotion by design. Interaction Design Institute Ivrea, 19.

Smith, G. (2007). What is interaction design? Designing Interactions, 8–19.

Shackelford, J. (2012). The Ted Book - A Video Book. Newspaper Next, LLC.

Frauenfelder, M. (2011). Make: Technology on your time: join the Arduino revolution.

Rodgers, P. A., & Smyth, M. (Eds.). (2010). Digital blur: creative practice at the boundaries of architecture, design and art. Faringdon: Libri Pub.

Yilmaz, B. (2014). Art Engineering and Kinetic Art. Journal of Arts and Humanities, 3(12), 16.

Atkinson, R. D., Mayo, M. J. (2010). Refueling the U.S. Innovation Economy: Fresh Approaches to Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) Education. The Information Technology & Innovation Foundation.

Dishman, L. (2016, March 21). Best and Worst Graduate Degrees for Jobs in 2016. Fortune. Available online: (accessed on 31 August 2016).

Provencio, E. (2015, April 5). The Major Divide: Humanities vs. STEM Majors. Huffington Post. Available online: (accessed on 12 April 2019).

Kim, Y., & Park, N. (2012). The Effect of STEAM Education on Elementary School Student’s Creativity Improvement. Computer Applications for Security, Control and System Engineering, 115–121. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-35264-5_16.

Land, M. H. (2013). Full STEAM Ahead: The Benefits of Integrating the Arts into STEM. Complex Adaptive Systems, 20 (Supplement C), 547–552. doi:10.1016/j.procs.2013.09.317.

Madden, M. E., Baxter, M., Beauchamp, H., Bouchard, K., Habermas, D., Huff, M., … Plague, G. (2013). Rethinking STEM Education: An Interdisciplinary STEAM Curriculum. Procedia Computer Science, 20 (Supplement C), 541–546. doi:10.1016/j.procs.2013.09.316.

Porter, T. M. (2020). Using Data to Understand the World. American Scientist, 108(3), 186-189.

Sorace, C. (2014). China’s Last Communist: Ai Weiwei. Critical Inquiry, 40(2), 396–419. doi:10.1086/674120.

Cheshire, G. (2012). Iran’s Cinematic Spring. Dissent, 59(2), 76–80. doi:10.1353/dss.2012.0029.

McDonald, A. G., Wessner, D. R. (2003). The visual art of HIV/AIDS: An interdisciplinary approach to teaching about HIV/AIDS. Bioscene, 29(1), 15–21.

Williams, G. (2017, September 12). Are Artists the New Interpreters of Scientific Innovation? The New York Times. Available online: (accessed on 31 March 2016).

Roads, C. (1980). Artificial Intelligence and Music. Computer Music Journal, 4(2), 13. doi:10.2307/3680079.

Behrens, R. R. (2009). Revisiting Abbott Thayer: non-scientific reflections about camouflage in art, war and zoology. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 364(1516), 497–501. doi:10.1098/rstb.2008.0250.

Ruskin, J. (1893). The Eagle’s Nest: Ten Lectures on the Relation of Natural Science to Art. Maynard, Merrill, & Company.

Jay, K. (2001). Connections: The Geometric Bridge between Art & Science (2nd Edition). World Scientific Publishing Company.

Doubrovski, Z., Verlinden, J. C., Geraedts, J. M. P. (2011). Optimal Design for Additive Manufacturing: Opportunities and Challenges (Vol. 9, pp. 635–646). Presented at the ASME 2011 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Washington DC, USA: ASME. doi:10.1115/DETC2011-48131.

Jansen, T. (2007). The great pretender. Rotterdam: 010 Publishers.

Taylor, J. R. (2013). Hitch: The Life and Times of Alfred Hitchcock. Bloomsbury Publishing.

Tzonis, A., Rosselli, P. (Eds.). (1999). Santiago Calatrava: the poetics of movement. London: Thames & Hudson.

Full Text: PDF

DOI: 10.28991/HIJ-2021-02-01-04


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2020 Giovanni Innella, Paul Anthony Rodgers