On the Role of Ethics in Shaping Technology Development

C. Vargas-Elizondo

Abstract


Important changes are taking place, currently, regarding the role of ethics in technology, particularly, in the context of the fourth industrial revolution.  The adoption by the General Assembly of United Nations of the resolution A/RES/70/1 on September 27th, 2015, entitled "Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development", better known as "sustainable development goals", is making that different international organisations and countries adopt it as the minimum reference ethical framework for assuring that this revolution in course supports and contributes to achieving these goals. To better understand these changes, it is important to make a historical reference to how technology and the role of ethics were understood during the past 50 years. In this paper, I take as reference the influencing book “The Challenge Presented to Cultures by Science and Technology” (1977) of the Genevan philosopher Jean Ladriére, some ethical proposals made during the '90s, to end with some recent European Union (2019) and World Economic Forum (2018) ethical proposals. I conclude that there are continuities and discontinuities, first in the conception of science and technology in Jean Ladriére and others, and how recent proposals are approaching the issue, second on the role of ethics in this fascinating and revolutionary process. However, we may envisage a radical transformation of the conception of technology in the context of the worldwide request of shaping the fourth industrial revolution.


Keywords


Ethics; Ethical Shaping of the Fourth Industrial Revolution; Technology Development; Human Sustainable Development; Sustainable Development Goals.

References


Ladriere, Jean (1977) The Challenge Presented to Cultures by Science and Technology. UNESCO, New York.

Papa Blanco, Francisco (1979) Tecnología y Desarrollo. Editorial Tecnológica de Costa Rica, Cartago, Costa Rica.

Lakatos, I. (1971). History of Science and its Rational Reconstructions. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 91–136. doi:10.1007/978-94-010-3142-4_7.

Agüero, U., & Sasgupta, S. (1987). A plausibility-driven approach to computer architecture design. Communications of the ACM, 30(11), 922–932. doi:10.1145/32206.32208.

Black, J. (2007). The Shock of the Old: Technology and Global History since 1900 - By David Edgerton. History, 92(308), 593–593. doi:10.1111/j.1468-229x.2007.410_61.x.

Skolimowski, H. (1966). The Structure of Thinking in Technology. Technology and Culture, 7(3), 371-383. doi:10.2307/3101935.

Franssen, Maarten, Gert-Jan Lokhorst, and Ibo van de Poel (2018). Philosophy of Technology, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2018 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.). Available online: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2018/entries/technology/.

National Research Council (2012), A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi:10.17226/13165.

UNO (2015). Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, A/RES/70/1. Available online: https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/post2015/transformingourworld/publication.

Rogerson, S. (2000). ETHIcol - How to create waffle, IMIS Journal, August, Vol 10 No 4, pp 29-30.

Kaner, Cem (2001) Business Ethics and Electronic Mail. Available online: http://www.kaner.com/pdfs/EthicsEmail.pdf (accessed on 15 August 2019).

The Franck Report (1945). Available online: http://fissilematerials.org/library/fra45.pdf.

Martin, C. D., Huff, C., Gotterbarn, D., & Miller, K. (1996). A framework for implementing and teaching the social and ethical impact of computing. Education and Information Technologies, 1(2). doi:10.1007/bf00168276.

Niblett, Robin (2020) Managing the Rising Influence of Nationalism. In WEF (2020) Shaping a Multiconceptual World 2020 Available online: http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Shaping_a_Multiconceptual_World_2020.pdf.

Brende, B. (2020). The Expansion of Geopolitics. In WEF (2020) Shaping a Multiconceptual World 2020. Available online: http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Shaping_a_Multiconceptual_World_2020.pdf.

Schwab, Klauss (2016). The Fourth Industrial Revolution. Available online: http://ebookbit.com/book?k=The+Fourth+Industrial+Revolution&charset=utf-8〈=en&isbn=978-1944835002&source=gfusion.

Philbeck,Thomas and Davis, Nicholas (2019), The Fourth Industrial Revolution: Shaping A New Era, Journal of International Affairs. Available online: https://jia.sipa.columbia.edu/fourth-industrial-revolution-shaping-new-era.

WEF-GFC (2019). Health and Healthcare in the Fourth Industrial Revolution Global Future Council on the Future of Health and Healthcare 2016-2018. World Economic Forum. Available online: https://www.weforum.org/reports/health-and-healthcare-in-the-fourth-industrial-revolution-global-future-council-on-the-future-of-health-and-healthcare-2016-2018.

Khedkar, Pratap and Sahay, Dharmendra (2019) Trends in Healthcare and Medical Innovation. In Cornell University, INSEAD, and WIPO (2019), The Global Innovation Index 2019: Creating Healthy Lives—The Future of Medical Innovation, Ithaca, Fontainebleau, and Geneva; pp 87-93.

Bulanda-Jansen, A. (2019). Evolution of The Metropolitan Area of Shenzhen, Analysis: From Theory to Selected Examples. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 471, 112058. doi:10.1088/1757-899x/471/11/112058.

World Bank (2019). The Changing Nature of Work. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1328-3.

W3C (2017), Web of Things (WoT) Architecture. Available online: https://www.w3.org/TR/2017/WD-wot-architecture-20170914/.

WEF (2018). Values, Ethics, and Innovation Rethinking Technological Development in the Fourth Industrial Revolution, White Paper. Available online: https://www.weforum.org/whitepapers/values-ethics-and-innovation-rethinking-technological-development-in-the-fourth-industrial-revolution.

UNDP (1994). Human Development Report 1994. United Nations, Oxford University Press. doi:10.18356/87e94501-en.

Gadamer, Hans-Georg (1977) Verdad y Método. Ediciones Sígueme, Spain.

Alexander, Larry, and Moore, Michael (2016). Deontological Ethics, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2016 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), Available online: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/ethics-deontological/.

Sinnott-Armstrong, Walter (2019) Consequentialism. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2019 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), Available online: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2019/entries/consequentialism/.

AI HLEG (2019). Ethics Guidelines for Trustworthy AI. European Commission. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu.

Heisenberg, Werner (1971) Physics and Beyond. Encounters and Conversations. Harper and Row, New York.

WEF (2016). The Future of Jobs. Employment, Skills and Workforce Strategy for the Fourth Industrial Revolution. Available online: http://reports.weforum.org/future-of-jobs-2016/chapter-1-the-future-of-jobs-and-skills/.

Frey, C. B., & Osborne, M. A. (2017). The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerisation? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 114, 254–280. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2016.08.019.

OECD, (2019), OECD Employment Outlook 2019. doi:10.1787/9ee00155-en.

Ramírez, Edgar Roy (2004). Mecanismos de Evasión de la Responsabilidad y otras reflexiones. In Alfaro, Mario and Ramirez, Roy, editors (2004) Ética, Ciencia y Tecnología. Editorial Tecnológica de Costa Rica.


Full Text: PDF

DOI: 10.28991/HIJ-2020-01-02-05

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 C. Vargas-Elizondo