Virtual Reality Tourism: Connecting Immersive Experiences to Future Travel Choices
Downloads
This empirical investigation examines the transformative impact of Virtual Reality (VR) implementations on destination accessibility within China's tourism sector. The research examines the interrelated relationships between VR Experience (VREX) determinants, experiential outcomes, and subsequent Visiting Intention (VIS). The theoretical framework encompasses three fundamental VREX antecedents: Telepresence (TLP), VR Application Quality (VAQ), and Perceived Realism (PREA). This research analyzes the impact of VREX on Perceived Enjoyment (PE) and Perceived Advantage (PAD), and in turn, their impact on VIS. Through purposive sampling methodology, the study gathered responses from 307 individuals actively engaging with VR tourism applications across China. Statistical analysis revealed significant associations between VREX and VIS, with all three antecedents demonstrating substantial influence on VREX formation. The findings establish that VREX has a significant impact on both PE and PAD dimensions. Notably, while PE emerged as a significant determinant of VIS, PAD demonstrated no substantial effect on visit intentions. This investigation advances theoretical discourse in virtual tourism by illuminating the crucial role of immersive technological experiences in destination marketing. For practitioners, these findings suggest prioritizing enjoyment-focused VR designs and investing in technologies that enhance telepresence and realism to influence potential tourists' visit intentions effectively.
Downloads
[1] Wang, J. C., Santoso, H. B., Changkaew, L., Tamtama, G. I. W., & Windasari, N. A. (2025). Virtual Reality in Dark Tourism: Multisensory Virtual Tourism Experiences with Thermal Stimuli. Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage, 18(2), 3720398. doi:10.1145/3720398.
[2] Sinha, N., Dhingra, S., Sehrawat, R., Jain, V., & Himanshu, H. (2025). Customers’ intention to use virtual reality in tourism: a comprehensive analysis of influencing factors. Tourism Review, 80(3), 742–766. doi:10.1108/TR-07-2023-0488.
[3] Talawar, A., S, S., & Alathur, S. (2025). Advancements of virtual reality in tourism and hospitality research. A hybrid review using the TCCM framework. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research, 30(1), 38–56. doi:10.1080/10941665.2024.2414890.
[4] Zhao, J. W., & Park, H. J. (2025). Enhancing value co-creation through mental imagery in virtual reality tourism. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research, 30(9), 1177–1187. doi:10.1080/10941665.2025.2486036.
[5] Sann, R., Luecha, P., & Rueangchaithanakun, R. (2024). The effects of virtual reality travel on satisfaction and visiting intention utilizing an extended stimulus-organism-response theory: perspectives from Thai tourists. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Insights, 7(5), 2684–2703. doi:10.1108/JHTI-05-2023-0321.
[6] Wismantoro, Y., Aryanto, V. D. W., Pamungkas, I. D., Purusa, N. A., Amron, Chasanah, A. N., & Usman. (2023). Virtual Reality Destination Experiences Model: A Moderating Variable between Wisesa Sustainable Tourism Behavior and Tourists’ Intention to Visit. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(1), 446. doi:10.3390/su15010446.
[7] Cao, X., Luo, Z., Qiu, J., & Liu, Y. (2022). Does ostracism impede Chinese tourist self-disclosure on WeChat? The perspective of social anxiety and self-construal. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 50, 178-187. doi:10.1016/j.jhtm.2022.02.013.
[8] Yu, J., Kim, S., Hailu, T. B., Park, J., & Han, H. (2024). The effects of virtual reality (VR) and augmented reality (AR) on senior tourists’ experiential quality, perceived advantages, perceived enjoyment, and reuse intention. Current Issues in Tourism, 27(3), 464–478. doi:10.1080/13683500.2023.2165483.
[9] Meenakshy, M., Chaudhary, V., Kumar, A., & Bhattacharyya, S. S. (2025). Virtual Reality-360° vs. Screen-360° Medium and Ecological vs. Recreational Story Type Impact on Sustainable Travel Intention. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 41(19), 12434–12448. doi:10.1080/10447318.2025.2462124.
[10] Junior Ladeira, W., de Oliveira Santini, F., Rasul, T., Hasan Jafar, S., Carlos De Oliveira Rosa, J., Frantz, B., Zandonai Pontin, P., & Antonio Lampert Dornelles, L. (2025). Telepresence in tourism and hospitality: a meta-analytic review of virtual environment. Current Issues in Tourism, 1–15. doi:10.1080/13683500.2025.2485378.
[11] Yersüren, S., & Özel, Ç. H. (2024). The effect of virtual reality experience quality on destination visit intention and virtual reality travel intention. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Technology, 15(1), 70–103. doi:10.1108/JHTT-02-2023-0046.
[12] Lee, Y. J., & Ji, Y. G. (2025). Effects of Visual Realism on Avatar Perception in Immersive and Non-Immersive Virtual Environments. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 41(7), 4362–4375. doi:10.1080/10447318.2024.2351713.
[13] Samin, T., Shabbir, R., & Abrar, M. (2025). Role of Telepresence and Information Quality in Driving Purchase Intention through Virtual Reality. The Critical Review of Social Sciences Studies, 3(1), 2943-2958. doi:10.59075/xngwsg79.
[14] Shin, H., & Kang, J. (2024). How does the metaverse travel experience influence virtual and actual travel behaviors? Focusing on the role of telepresence and avatar identification. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 58, 174–183. doi:10.1016/j.jhtm.2023.12.009.
[15] Lee, M., Lee, S. A., Jeong, M., & Oh, H. (2020). Quality of virtual reality and its impacts on behavioral intention. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 90, 102595. doi:10.1016/j.ijhm.2020.102595.
[16] Molina, E., Jerez, A. R., & Gómez, N. P. (2020). Avatars rendering and its effect on perceived realism in Virtual Reality. Proceedings - 2020 IEEE International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Virtual Reality, AIVR 2020, 222–225. doi:10.1109/AIVR50618.2020.00046.
[17] Jung, S., & Lindeman, R. W. (2021). Perspective: Does Realism Improve Presence in VR? Suggesting a Model and Metric for VR Experience Evaluation. Frontiers in Virtual Reality, 2, 693327. doi:10.3389/frvir.2021.693327.
[18] Jo, H., & Park, D. H. (2023). Affordance, usefulness, enjoyment, and aesthetics in sustaining virtual reality engagement. Scientific Reports, 13(1), 15097. doi:10.1038/s41598-023-42113-1.
[19] Leveau, P. H., & Camus, et S. (2023). Embodiment, immersion, and enjoyment in virtual reality marketing experiences. Psychology and Marketing, 40(7), 1329–1343. doi:10.1002/mar.21822.
[20] Moreira, G. J., Luna-Nevarez, C., & McGovern, E. (2022). It’s About Enjoying the Virtual Experience: the Role of Enjoyment and Engagement in the Adoption of Virtual Reality in Marketing Education. Marketing Education Review, 32(3), 224–239. doi:10.1080/10528008.2021.1965486.
[21] Checa, D., & Bustillo, A. (2020). Advantages and limits of virtual reality in learning processes: Briviesca in the fifteenth century. Virtual Reality, 24(1), 151–161. doi:10.1007/s10055-019-00389-7.
[22] Straatmann, T., Schumacher, J. P., Koßmann, C., Poehler, L., Teuteberg, F., Mueller, K., & Hamborg, K. C. (2022). Advantages of virtual reality for the participative design of work processes: An integrative perspective. Work, 72(4), 1765–1788. doi:10.3233/WOR-211260.
[23] Shi, M., Deng, L., Zhang, M., & Long, Y. (2025). How telepresence and perceived enjoyment mediate the relationship between interaction quality and continuance intention: Evidence from China Zisha-ware Digital Museum. PLoS ONE, 20, 317784. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0317784.
[24] Yusra, Y., Vilzati, V., Eliana, E., Ariffin, A. A. M., & Susanto, P. (2023). Stimulating Visit Intention Using Social Media Influencer: Mediating Role of Enjoyment. Indonesian Journal of Business and Entrepreneurship, 9(2), 295–295. doi:10.17358/ijbe.9.2.295.
[25] Zhou, B., Liu, S., Yu, H., Zhu, D., & Xiong, Q. (2022). Perceived Benefits and Forest Tourists Consumption Intention: Environmental Protection Attitude and Resource Utilization Attitude as Mediators. Forests, 13(5), 812. doi:10.3390/f13050812.
[26] Saleem, T., Talpur, Q. ul ain, Ishaq, M. I., Raza, A., & Junaid, M. (2024). Exploring the effect of telepresence and escapism on consumer post-purchase intention in an immersive virtual reality environment. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 81, 104014. doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2024.104014.
[27] Debarba, H. G., Montagud, M., Chagué, S., Herrero, J. G. L., Lacosta, I., Langa, S. F., & Charbonnier, C. (2024). Content format and quality of experience in virtual reality. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 83(15), 46481–46506. doi:10.1007/s11042-022-12176-9.
[28] Newman, M., Gatersleben, B., Wyles, K. J., & Ratcliffe, E. (2022). The use of virtual reality in environment experiences and the importance of realism. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 79, 101733. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2021.101733.
[29] Weber, S., Weibel, D., & Mast, F. W. (2021). How to Get There When You Are There Already? Defining Presence in Virtual Reality and the Importance of Perceived Realism. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 628298. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.628298.
[30] Mouatt, B., Smith, A. E., Mellow, M. L., Parfitt, G., Smith, R. T., & Stanton, T. R. (2020). The Use of Virtual Reality to Influence Motivation, Affect, Enjoyment, and Engagement During Exercise: A Scoping Review. Frontiers in Virtual Reality, 1, 564664. doi:10.3389/frvir.2020.564664.
[31] Jang, Y., & Park, E. (2019). An adoption model for virtual reality games: The roles of presence and enjoyment. Telematics and Informatics, 42, 101239. doi:10.1016/j.tele.2019.101239.
[32] Basuki, R., Tarigan, Z. J. H., Siagian, H., Limanta, L. S., Setiawan, D., & Mochtar, J. (2022). The effects of perceived ease of use, usefulness, enjoyment and intention to use online platforms on behavioral intention in online movie watching during the pandemic era. International Journal of Data and Network Science, 6(1), 253-262. doi:10.5267/J.IJDNS.2021.9.003.
[33] Wang, H., & Lee, K. (2020). Getting in the flow together: The role of social presence, perceived enjoyment and concentration on sustainable use intention of mobile social network game. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(17), 6853. doi:10.3390/SU12176853.
[34] Han, H., Baek, H., Lee, K., & Huh, B. (2014). Perceived Benefits, Attitude, Image, Desire, and Intention in Virtual Golf Leisure. Journal of Hospitality Marketing and Management, 23(5), 465–486. doi:10.1080/19368623.2013.813888.
[35] Khan, A., Chen, C. C., Suanpong, K., Ruangkanjanases, A., Kittikowit, S., & Chen, S. C. (2021). The impact of CSR on sustainable innovation ambidexterity: The mediating role of sustainable supply chain management and second-order social capital. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(21), 12160. doi:10.3390/su132112160.
[36] Atzeni, M., Del Chiappa, G., & Mei Pung, J. (2022). Enhancing visit intention in heritage tourism: The role of object-based and existential authenticity in non-immersive virtual reality heritage experiences. International Journal of Tourism Research, 24(2), 240–255. doi:10.1002/jtr.2497.
[37] Ribbens, W., Malliet, S., Van Eck, R., & Larkin, D. (2016). Perceived realism in shooting games: Towards scale validation. Computers in Human Behavior, 64, 308–318. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.06.055.
[38] Wei, N., & Li, Z. W. (2021). Telepresence and interactivity in mobile learning system: Its relation with open innovation. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 7(1), 1–18. doi:10.3390/joitmc7010078.
[39] Yang, X. (2024). Mobile learning application characteristics and learners’ continuance intentions: The role of flow experience. Education and Information Technologies, 29(2), 2259–2275. doi:10.1007/s10639-023-11910-6.
[40] Jung, T., tom Dieck, M. C., Lee, H., & Chung, N. (2016). Effects of Virtual Reality and Augmented Reality on Visitor Experiences in Museum. Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism 2016, 621–635. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-28231-2_45.
[41] Atkinson, N. L. (2007). Developing a questionnaire to measure perceived attributes of eHealth innovations. American Journal of Health Behavior, 31(6), 612–621. doi:10.5993/AJHB.31.6.6.
[42] Brislin, R. W. Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1(3), 185–216.
[43] Hulland, J. (1999). Use of partial least squares (PLS) in strategic management research: A review of four recent studies. Strategic Management Journal, 20(2), 195–204. doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-0266(199902)20:2<195::aid-smj13>3.0.co;2-7.
[44] Petter, S., Straub, D., & Rai, A. (2007). Specifying formative constructs in information systems research. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 31(4), 623–656. doi:10.2307/25148814.
[45] Chin & Newsted P. R., W. W. (1999). Structural Equation Modeling Analysis with Small Samples Using Partial Least Square. Statistical Strategies for Small Sample Research, 1(1), 307–341.
[46] Zhao, H., & Khan, A. (2022). The Students’ Flow Experience With the Continuous Intention of Using Online English Platforms. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 807084–807084. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.807084.
[47] Ringle, C. M., Wende, S., & Becker, J. M. (2022). SmartPLS 4 GmbH. Available online: http://www.smartpls.com (accessed on August 2025).
[48] Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common Method Biases in Behavioral Research: A Critical Review of the Literature and Recommended Remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879.
[49] Henseler, J., Dijkstra, T. K., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., Diamantopoulos, A., Straub, D. W., Ketchen, D. J., Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., & Calantone, R. J. (2014). Common Beliefs and Reality About PLS: Comments on Rönkkö and Evermann (2013). Organizational Research Methods, 17(2), 182–209. doi:10.1177/1094428114526928.
[50] Nguyen, S. Van, & Habók, A. (2021). Designing and validating the learner autonomy perception questionnaire. Heliyon, 7(4), 6831. doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06831.
[51] Chin, W. W., & Newsted, P. R. (1998). The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. Modern methods for business research. Statistical Strategies for Small Sample Research, 295(2), 295-336.
[52] Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. doi:10.1177/002224378101800104.
[53] Torkzadeh, G., Koufteros, X., & Pflughoeft, K. (2003). Confirmatory analysis of computer self-efficacy. Structural Equation Modeling, 10(2), 263–275. doi:10.1207/S15328007SEM1002_6.
[54] Akossou, A. Y. J. (2013). Impact of data structure on the estimators R-square and adjusted R-square in linear regression. International Journal of Mathematics and Computation, 20(3), 84–93.
[55] Anwar, M. S., Wang, J., Ullah, A., Khan, W., Ahmad, S., & Fei, Z. (2020). Measuring quality of experience for 360-degree videos in virtual reality. Science China Information Sciences, 63(10), 1–15. doi:10.1007/s11432-019-2734-y.
[56] Bowman, N. D., Vandewalle, A., Daneels, R., Lee, Y., & Chen, S. (2024). Animating a Plausible Past: Perceived Realism and Sense of Place Influence Entertainment of and Tourism Intentions From Historical Video Games. Games and Culture, 19(3), 286–308. doi:10.1177/15554120231162428.
[57] Sodawan, A., & Hsu, R. L. W. (2022). Halal-Friendly Attributes and Muslims’ Visit Intention: Exploring the Roles of Perceived Value and Destination Trust. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(19), 12002. doi:10.3390/su141912002.
[58] McGovern, E., Moreira, G., & Luna-Nevarez, C. (2020). An application of virtual reality in education: Can this technology enhance the quality of students’ learning experience? Journal of Education for Business, 95(7), 490–496. doi:10.1080/08832323.2019.1703096.
[59] Yu, J., Kim, S., Baah, N. G., Seo, J., & Han, H. (2023). Influence of vegan attributes on hotel consumption value, perceived advantages, and word-of-mouth and revisit intentions. Journal of Travel and Tourism Marketing, 40(8), 639–652. doi:10.1080/10548408.2023.2285301.
[60] Cascetta, E., & Henke, I. (2023). The seventh transport revolution and the new challenges for sustainable mobility. Journal of Urban Mobility, 4, 100059. doi:10.1016/j.urbmob.2023.100059.
[61] Ho, H. C. Y., & Chan, Y. C. (2022). Longitudinal associations between psychological capital and problem-solving among social workers: A two-wave cross-lagged study. Health and Social Care in the Community, 30(5), e2702–e2711. doi:10.1111/hsc.13713.
[62] Chen, C. T., Chen, S. C., Khan, A., Lim, M. K., & Tseng, M. L. (2024). Antecedents of big data analytics and artificial intelligence adoption on operational performance: the ChatGPT platform. Industrial Management and Data Systems, 124(7), 2388-2413. doi:10.1108/IMDS-10-2023-0778.
- This work (including HTML and PDF Files) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
